[UNITED STATES] As the 2024 presidential election approaches, former President Donald Trump's proposed immigration policies have sparked intense debate across various sectors of the American economy. One area that could face significant challenges is the housing market and construction industry. Trump's pledge to implement a mass deportation campaign, if elected, has raised concerns among experts about its potential impact on the construction workforce and, consequently, on housing affordability.
The Proposed Policy and Its Implications
Donald Trump has vowed to lead "the largest domestic deportation operation in American history" if he returns to the White House. This ambitious plan could involve deporting up to 1.2 million people, although estimates suggest that as many as 11 million undocumented residents currently live in the United States.
While the feasibility of such a large-scale operation remains a topic of debate, the potential consequences for the construction industry and housing market are drawing serious attention from experts and industry leaders.
The Critical Role of Immigrant Workers in Construction
Workforce Demographics
The construction industry heavily relies on immigrant labor to meet its workforce needs. According to Jim Tobin, CEO of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), foreign-born workers make up as much as a third of the sector's labor force. These workers often specialize in specific trades essential for homebuilding, such as plastering and drywall installation.
Tobin emphasizes the importance of this workforce, stating, "We consistently see government data showing that we are anywhere between 200,000 to 400,000 workers short in our industry and that lack of skilled labor slows down the pace of construction, drives up labor costs, and ultimately leads to higher home prices, and a slower pace of home building".
The Potential Impact on Housing Costs
Labor Shortage and Cost Increases
A sudden reduction in the immigrant workforce could exacerbate the existing labor shortage in the construction industry. This shortage would likely lead to:
- Increased labor costs as companies compete for a smaller pool of workers
- Slower construction timelines, delaying the completion of new homes
- Higher home prices as builders pass on increased costs to buyers
Research supports these predictions. A study by the George W. Bush Institute found that U.S. metropolitan areas with the highest immigrant population growth experienced the lowest construction costs. This suggests that removing a significant portion of the immigrant workforce could lead to a rise in building expenses.
Historical Precedent
A research paper examining the effects of the "Secure Communities" program, which led to the deportation of over 300,000 undocumented immigrants between 2008 and 2014, provides insight into potential outcomes. The study found that three years after the program's implementation, the average new construction property became 17% more expensive in affected counties compared to the baseline.
This translates to a substantial increase of $57,300 compared to the average property price before the program's implementation. Moreover, the study noted a significant decrease in construction activity, with counties foregoing "the equivalent of an entire year's worth of additional residential construction".
Industry Response and Adaptation Strategies
Attracting Domestic Workers
If mass deportations were to occur, the construction industry would likely need to intensify efforts to attract domestic workers. Jim Tobin suggests that the industry would have to "redouble our efforts in attracting new domestic interest in the trades". This could involve targeting various demographics, including:
- High school graduates
- Adults seeking career changes
- Transitioning military personnel
- Previously incarcerated individuals
However, attracting and training a new workforce would take time and resources, potentially leading to short-term disruptions in the housing market.
Wage Increases and Competition
To attract domestic workers, the construction industry would likely need to offer higher wages. This wage increase would not occur in isolation, as other immigrant-dependent sectors would also be competing for workers. The resulting wage inflation could further drive up construction costs and, ultimately, home prices.
The Debate: Supply vs. Demand
Trump Campaign's Perspective
The Trump campaign has suggested that cracking down on immigration could ease housing unaffordability by removing a source of demand. Vice President candidate JD Vance has pointed to "millions of undocumented immigrants" as a factor adding pressure to the supply-constrained housing market.
Expert Analysis
However, economists generally doubt that immigrant demand is a major driver of housing costs. Data shows that rents and home prices began surging in 2020 and 2021 when net immigration inflows were close to the two-decade average.
Additional Policy Considerations
Tariffs and Construction Costs
Trump's platform also includes a proposal to raise tariffs on virtually all imports to the United States, with duties on Chinese imports potentially increasing by as much as 60%. This policy could further impact construction costs, as many building materials are imported.
The construction industry has already experienced the effects of tariffs, such as the 15% tariff on Canadian softwood lumber. These additional costs are typically passed on to homebuyers, further exacerbating affordability issues.
Industry Perspectives and Concerns
Skepticism and Pragmatism
While some contractors dismiss Trump's deportation plan as political rhetoric, many industry leaders express genuine concern about its potential impact. Stan Marek, CEO of Marek Companies, a Texas-based subcontracting firm, doubts the feasibility of assembling construction crews if a massive number of workers were removed.
Marek, who has long advocated for pathways allowing undocumented individuals to work legally in the construction sector, believes reforms are long overdue. He emphasizes the industry's reliance on immigrant workers, stating, "We need them. They've been building our houses for the last 30 years".
Call for Immigration Reform
Jim Tobin of the NAHB urges policymakers to address immigration reform seriously. He states, "The rhetoric surrounding immigration is at a peak. We must engage in a serious discussion about immigration policy and reform, and further delays are unacceptable".
Economic Implications Beyond Housing
Broader Economic Impact
The potential effects of mass deportation extend beyond the housing market. Ron Hetrick, a senior labor economist at workforce analytics firm Lightcast, warns that such a policy could be "incredibly disruptive," leading to a "very significant hit" on home construction and the broader economy.
Lessons from State-Level Policies
Florida's Experience
Recent immigration policies implemented in Florida provide a glimpse into potential outcomes. When Governor Ron DeSantis introduced stringent restrictions to deter undocumented immigrants, many laborers left the state even before the laws were enacted. This led to disruptions in construction projects and raised concerns among builders.
Arizona's Past Policy
Arizona's implementation of strict immigration laws in 2010 offers another case study. The exodus of workers during the rollout of the legislation had lasting effects, with many never returning even after parts of the law were rescinded.
Trump's proposed mass deportation plan, if implemented, could have far-reaching consequences for the U.S. housing market and construction industry. The potential loss of a significant portion of the immigrant workforce could lead to labor shortages, increased construction costs, and ultimately, higher home prices for buyers.
While the full impact of such a policy remains speculative, historical precedents and expert analyses suggest that it could exacerbate existing challenges in housing affordability and construction capacity. As the debate continues, policymakers and industry leaders must carefully consider the complex interplay between immigration policy, workforce dynamics, and housing market stability.