[WORLD] South Korea has become the latest country to take action, blocking the Chinese startup DeepSeek from government computers. This decision has raised concerns about data security and the transparency of AI companies. The move follows similar actions taken by other nations, including Italy and Australia, questioning the data management practices of DeepSeek’s services.
DeepSeek, a Chinese AI company, recently gained attention with the launch of its R1 chatbot, a generative AI system positioned as a competitor to leading U.S. models, such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT. The R1 chatbot was touted as matching the capabilities of other top-tier AI products, but at a significantly lower cost, prompting interest from various sectors around the world. However, the company’s rapid rise has been accompanied by concerns over how it handles sensitive user data.
South Korea’s Action: Blocking Access to DeepSeek
On February 6, 2025, South Korea’s defense and trade ministries made the decision to block access to DeepSeek’s services on government computers. This move was initiated after the country's data watchdog raised concerns about the company’s data practices. In particular, South Korea sought clarification from DeepSeek about how it manages and safeguards user information, especially given the sensitive nature of governmental data.
A spokesperson from South Korea’s defense ministry explained the rationale behind this decision: “Access to DeepSeek from military work computers has been blocked. The ministry has reinforced security precautions regarding the use of generative AI and implemented necessary pre-emptive measures for military personnel’s work devices.” This statement highlights the growing concern over the potential vulnerabilities introduced by AI tools in government networks.
The trade ministry echoed similar sentiments, adding that access to DeepSeek’s services was also temporarily restricted on all work computers within the ministry. Despite these precautions, DeepSeek has not yet responded to the data inquiry submitted by South Korea’s data protection authorities, further escalating the concerns.
Rising Global Concern Over Chinese AI
South Korea's decision comes amid a broader international trend where countries are increasingly scrutinizing Chinese AI firms. This scrutiny is not merely about the technological capabilities of AI tools like DeepSeek but focuses largely on the management of data and the potential risks associated with the involvement of Chinese firms. Given the Chinese government's influence over businesses in the country, there are widespread concerns about the accessibility of data by state actors.
The United States, for instance, has already raised alarms about the potential for Chinese AI companies to harvest sensitive data from users worldwide. Countries in the European Union have also expressed similar concerns, particularly after AI companies like DeepSeek started making significant inroads into European markets. South Korea, in this context, is aligning itself with its international counterparts in ensuring that sensitive governmental data does not fall into potentially harmful hands.
The Role of Data Security and Privacy in AI Deployment
The core issue surrounding the banning of DeepSeek is data security and privacy. As generative AI tools such as DeepSeek’s R1 gain traction in both commercial and governmental sectors, questions about how these platforms collect, store, and process user data have come to the forefront. In South Korea’s case, the country’s data protection authorities specifically requested that DeepSeek clarify its data management practices.
The defense ministry’s move to block access to DeepSeek on military computers highlights the heightened sensitivity around the use of AI in sectors involving national security. The ministry’s spokesperson emphasized that the government was taking proactive measures to secure military networks, stating, “The ministry has reinforced security precautions regarding the use of generative AI and implemented necessary pre-emptive measures for military personnel’s work devices.” These precautions underline the risks that such AI technologies could pose in terms of espionage, data theft, or unauthorized surveillance.
Similarly, the trade ministry’s actions reflect a broader concern about the general use of AI tools within the public sector. As generative AI models become more integrated into everyday work processes, their ability to access and process large volumes of sensitive information raises red flags. The South Korean government’s temporary restrictions are likely a precautionary measure aimed at safeguarding sensitive data from potential security breaches.
The International Trend: Italy, Australia, and Beyond
South Korea is not alone in its concerns about the security of Chinese AI platforms. Italy and Australia have previously taken similar actions, reflecting a growing international movement to scrutinize Chinese technology companies, particularly in the AI sector. These actions signal a trend where governments are exercising greater caution in deploying AI systems developed by companies with potential ties to foreign state actors.
For instance, both Italy and Australia have blocked Chinese AI tools or demanded more transparency from companies like DeepSeek, which has yet to fully respond to the inquiries from various national data protection authorities. This lack of transparency has fueled the concerns of governments, which fear that AI models could be used to gather sensitive data or even manipulate users without their knowledge.
As AI tools are adopted more widely, the importance of data privacy and security will only continue to grow. This trend is expected to continue as countries navigate the complexities of regulating AI technologies while ensuring national security.
Potential Economic Impact on DeepSeek
The actions taken by South Korea could have significant implications for DeepSeek’s business strategy, particularly in international markets. While the company has positioned itself as a cost-effective alternative to U.S.-based AI giants, the rising concerns over data privacy could hinder its ability to expand into certain regions.
DeepSeek’s ability to address these concerns and provide transparency about its data practices will be critical for its success in the global market. Failure to respond satisfactorily to inquiries from governments could result in deeper mistrust and the loss of important business opportunities. On the other hand, demonstrating a commitment to robust data protection measures could help the company rebuild its reputation and potentially regain access to markets that have expressed reservations.
South Korea’s decision to block Chinese AI company DeepSeek from government computers is part of a growing trend of scrutiny over the data management practices of AI firms, particularly those from China. The move underscores the increasing importance of data security in the deployment of AI technologies, especially in sectors involving national security and government operations. As more countries, including South Korea, Italy, and Australia, take a closer look at the potential risks associated with Chinese AI companies, the global conversation about AI governance and data privacy is bound to intensify.
For South Korea, the ban on DeepSeek reflects a cautious approach to adopting new technologies while prioritizing the security and integrity of government systems. As AI continues to evolve, the challenge for governments will be to balance the benefits of innovative technology with the need for strict data protection standards.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
