[SINGAPORE] As Singapore approaches its next general election (GE2025), political observers and experts are speculating on the emerging dynamics that will shape the contest. One of the most anticipated aspects of GE2025 is the rise in multi-way fights in Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs). Historically, multi-way contests in GRCs have been rare, with the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) often facing limited opposition. However, experts now predict that these multi-cornered battles will be more prevalent in GE2025, offering new dynamics for both voters and political parties.
A Group Representation Constituency (GRC) is a special feature of Singapore’s electoral system, introduced in 1988 to ensure a more representative parliament that includes minority voices. In a GRC, several candidates, typically from the same party, contest as a team to represent a group of constituencies. The team with the highest number of votes wins the seat, and all members of that team are elected as Members of Parliament (MPs).
Multi-way fights occur when more than two political parties or coalitions field candidates in a GRC, leading to a situation where the ruling party must face multiple challengers. While such contests have been relatively rare in previous elections, the political landscape is shifting, and experts believe the upcoming GE2025 will see more of these multi-way battles in GRCs.
Why Are Multi-Way Fights Becoming More Common?
Several factors contribute to the prediction that multi-way fights in GRCs will become more common in GE2025. The main drivers of this change include the increasing political diversification in Singapore, the rise of new opposition parties, and the evolving strategies of the ruling PAP.
1. Political Diversification and Fragmentation
Over the years, Singapore’s political landscape has diversified. While the PAP remains the dominant force, opposition parties have gained significant ground in recent elections. The Workers' Party (WP), in particular, has grown to become the main opposition party, securing substantial victories in GRCs. Other parties, such as the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), the Progress Singapore Party (PSP), and the newly formed Reform Party, have also played a growing role in Singapore's political landscape.
Experts believe that with more opposition parties fielding candidates in GRCs, multi-way contests will become increasingly common. In some constituencies, voters are likely to see contests involving candidates from multiple opposition parties, each attempting to capture a slice of the electorate. As opposition parties grow in strength and visibility, their ability to mount serious challenges in GRCs increases, raising the likelihood of more multi-cornered fights.
2. Emergence of New Political Players
Another contributing factor to the rise of multi-way contests is the emergence of new political players. Since the last general election in 2020, Singapore has witnessed the rise of several new opposition parties, each with its own distinctive platform. For instance, the PSP, led by former PAP member Tan Cheng Bock, has been actively contesting elections and has gained support in various constituencies.
Similarly, other parties such as the Singapore People's Party (SPP) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have begun to establish a more visible presence in the political arena. These new parties are likely to field candidates in GRCs, resulting in multi-way contests with a larger pool of choices for voters.
3. The PAP's Evolving Strategy
The ruling PAP, while maintaining its dominance in Singapore’s political scene, is not immune to the evolving dynamics of the electoral landscape. In recent years, the PAP has been facing increasing scrutiny over issues such as income inequality, housing, and healthcare. As a result, the PAP has had to adjust its strategies to respond to the changing needs of the electorate.
In some cases, the PAP has opted to field new faces in GRCs, trying to inject fresh energy into its political campaigns. While this strategy aims to maintain its stronghold on GRCs, it also creates opportunities for opposition parties to challenge these newly introduced candidates. With multiple parties now contesting the same GRCs, the PAP may find itself in more multi-way battles than ever before.
4. Voter Shifts and Greater Expectations
Voter expectations are also shifting. As the electorate becomes more diverse, there is a growing desire for alternative voices and a broader representation of political views in the parliament. As voters seek greater accountability and transparency, opposition parties are likely to gain traction in multi-way fights.
This shift in voter behavior is particularly important in the context of younger voters, who have shown a greater willingness to explore alternative political options. Experts suggest that this trend is likely to contribute to the rise in multi-cornered contests, as voters increasingly demand diverse perspectives on national issues.
The Impact of Multi-Way Fights on the GE2025 Outcome
The increased prevalence of multi-way fights in GRCs could have a significant impact on the outcome of GE2025. Experts predict that multi-cornered battles will lead to more dynamic and competitive campaigns, with greater emphasis placed on issues that matter to the electorate.
1. Increased Voter Engagement and Turnout
Multi-way contests have the potential to generate greater interest and engagement among voters. With more choices available, voters may feel more invested in the election process, leading to higher voter turnout. The presence of multiple parties in a GRC could lead to more spirited debates, where candidates are forced to differentiate themselves more clearly on key issues.
A greater sense of competition could also push all political parties to adopt more compelling platforms and engage in more direct outreach to voters. This, in turn, could lead to a more dynamic and interactive electoral process, benefiting the overall democratic health of the country.
2. The Risk of Splitting the Opposition Vote
While multi-way contests provide more choices, they also come with the risk of splitting the opposition vote. In some GRCs, the presence of multiple opposition candidates could divide the vote among various opposition factions, making it easier for the PAP to maintain its dominance. This "vote splitting" phenomenon could reduce the chances of opposition parties winning a GRC, even if they collectively secure a majority of votes.
Experts warn that this issue could be especially pronounced in constituencies where opposition support is fragmented. In such cases, opposition parties will need to work more strategically to coordinate their campaigns and avoid splitting the vote, which could ultimately benefit the PAP.
3. Increased Complexity in Coalition Building
Another challenge posed by multi-way fights in GRCs is the potential complexity in coalition building. While coalitions between opposition parties have become more common in recent years, the presence of multiple parties in a GRC could make it harder to form cohesive alliances. This fragmentation could lead to difficulties in maintaining party unity and presenting a unified opposition front, especially if different factions within the opposition disagree on key issues.
However, experts also point out that multi-way contests could lead to more robust political discourse. With more parties vying for attention, voters are likely to hear a wider range of viewpoints, encouraging healthier debate and a more nuanced understanding of the country’s challenges.
According to experts, multi-way fights in GRCs are expected to be a prominent feature of GE2025. Dr. Gillian Koh, senior research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), remarked: “In some constituencies, multi-cornered contests will increase as opposition parties continue to grow in strength, and voters will be more exposed to a wider range of political voices.”
Dr. Koh also noted the importance of strategic campaigning: “With multiple candidates in the race, it is essential for opposition parties to be mindful of vote splitting. They will need to consider whether to coordinate with other parties or risk dividing the electorate.”
Political analyst Dr. Eugene Tan further added: “The rise of multi-way contests signals that Singapore’s political landscape is maturing. It also reflects the fact that voters are increasingly open to different political ideas, which is a positive development for democracy.”
As GE2025 approaches, the expected rise in multi-way fights in GRCs signals a new era of political competition in Singapore. While these contests may present challenges for opposition parties, they also offer opportunities for greater representation and more diverse political discourse. As the electorate becomes more politically engaged, GE2025 is set to be a significant moment in Singapore's democratic development. Whether these multi-way fights will lead to a shift in political power remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: GE2025 will likely be an election like no other in Singapore's history.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
