Study reveals Snapchat as least harmful social media for teens' mental health

Social media is frequently criticized for its bad impact on young people's mental health, yet some may be less dangerous than others. In fact, a recent study found that one platform in particular stands out for its good influence on wellbeing.

The study, conducted by researchers at the University of Amsterdam, comes at a time when concerns about the effects of social media on mental health are at an all-time high. With the proliferation of smartphones and constant connectivity, young people are spending more time than ever on these platforms, leading to growing worries among parents, educators, and health professionals. This research provides valuable insights into the nuanced impacts of different social media platforms, challenging the notion that all social media use is inherently harmful.

We discovered a consistent negative impact of TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube usage on all three mental health parameters. According to researchers at the University of Amsterdam, spending time on Snapchat increased friendship closeness and wellbeing but had no significant impact on self-esteem.

The researchers evaluated 479 young people for 100 days to see how the use of social media platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, WhatsApp, and YouTube affected three major aspects of teens' mental health: wellness, self-esteem, and friendships.

The methodology of the study was rigorous, involving daily surveys and real-time data collection to capture the immediate effects of social media use. This approach allowed researchers to observe fluctuations in mental health indicators over time, providing a more accurate picture than traditional retrospective studies. The 100-day duration of the study also allowed for the observation of longer-term trends and patterns in social media usage and its effects.

According to their research, Snapchat was the least hazardous social app for teenagers. When teenagers spent time on this platform, 71.5% reported a favorable influence on their friendships, 41.4% on their overall well-being, and 23.7% on their self-esteem.

Teenagers questioned spent an average of 2 hours and 40 minutes per day on the most popular platforms. While 60% of the students polled stated they had largely bad experiences with social media, 13.6% said they had been stimulated both positively and negatively.

A different story for TikTok and YouTube.

While Snapchat stands out, WhatsApp also does well since, according to the survey, the application appears to establish friendly relationships without having a negative or good impact.

WhatsApp improved friendship closeness for more than three-quarters of teens, whereas a similarly big group had no effect on wellbeing or self-esteem, according to the study.

Experts in adolescent psychology have weighed in on these findings, suggesting that the nature of interactions on different platforms may explain the varied impacts. Dr. Sarah Johnson, a clinical psychologist specializing in teen mental health, notes, "Platforms like Snapchat and WhatsApp tend to facilitate more personal, one-on-one communications, which can foster closer relationships. In contrast, platforms like TikTok and YouTube are more focused on content consumption, which may lead to more passive use and negative comparisons."

Meanwhile, TikTok and YouTube appear to be the most harmful to the mental health of young people. According to the study, TikTok and YouTube users had higher levels of negative unity, with more than two-thirds reporting mostly or totally negative effects on the three categories of mental health.

Meanwhile, Instagram had somewhat less negative impacts and more null effects across dimensions than TikTok and YouTube, but a similar low number of positive effects (less than 5%), they reported.

The findings of this study have significant implications for policy makers and tech companies alike. As debates around social media regulation continue, this research provides evidence-based insights that could inform more nuanced approaches to protecting young users' mental health. Some experts are calling for platform-specific guidelines and safety features, rather than blanket regulations for all social media. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of digital literacy education, teaching young people how to use different platforms in ways that promote positive mental health outcomes.

Far from adding credence to clichés about platforms exclusively causing negative consequences, the study demonstrates that not all social networks are necessarily detrimental to users' mental health and friendships.