Multiple Israeli bombs on Syria's Hama countryside late yesterday killed at least four people, Syrian state television said, with sources claiming the bombings targeted a key military research center.
The attack comes amid heightened tensions in the region, as Israel continues to respond to the October 7 Hamas attack. The escalation of strikes in Syria underscores the complex web of alliances and conflicts in the Middle East, with Israel seeking to curb Iranian influence and prevent the transfer of advanced weapons to groups it considers hostile.
Since Hamas's attack on Israeli civilians and soldiers on October 7, Israel has expanded its raids against Iranian-backed militia targets in Syria, as well as Syrian army air defenses and some Syrian military.
According to a local health official quoted by Syria's state news agency, 13 people were hurt, including three critically, as a result of Sunday's strikes near Misyaf, and ambulances are currently transporting the injured.
The targeting of Misyaf is particularly significant, as the area has long been suspected of housing critical military installations. International observers have noted that the repeated strikes on this location suggest its strategic importance in the ongoing regional power struggle.
According to two regional intelligence sources, a significant military research center for chemical weapons manufacture near Misyaf was repeatedly targeted. It is thought to house a group of Iranian military professionals working in weapons manufacture.
Syria's state media reportedly said that the strikes started two flames, which firefighters were working to put out.
The alleged presence of Iranian military professionals at the site highlights the ongoing cooperation between Syria and Iran, a partnership that has been a source of concern for Israel and its allies. This collaboration extends beyond conventional military support, potentially encompassing the development of advanced weapons systems and technologies.
Israel has made no quick statement, as it normally does not respond to specific reports of strikes in Syria.
The silence from Israeli officials is characteristic of their approach to operations in Syria, maintaining a policy of strategic ambiguity. This tactic allows Israel to conduct operations while minimizing the risk of direct confrontation or escalation with other regional powers. However, the frequency and intensity of these strikes have raised questions about the long-term implications for regional stability.
In the most high-profile attack on Syria since the Gaza conflict began, suspected Israeli airplanes hit Iran's embassy in April, killing seven military advisers, including three senior commanders, according to Iran.
The strike on Iran's embassy marked a significant escalation in the shadow war between Israel and Iran, pushing the boundaries of conventional military engagement. The targeting of diplomatic facilities, while rare, demonstrates the high stakes involved in the regional power struggle and the willingness of actors to take bold and controversial actions to advance their strategic interests.